According to the «constant notion of looking at short-label and you will a lot of time-label mating since not being contrary poles», i already brought this notion in the earlier sort of the fresh new manuscript (today inside pp. 4-5, outlines 91-108):
It conventional look at mating direction has been criticized from the specific authors, instance Jackson and you will Kirkpatrick , just who said that small-name and you may much time-label orientation do not have to become opposing posts, but dimensions that, while adversely associated, might be classified. Some other experts demonstrate the appropriateness away from abandoning this new antique unidimensional stance out of short-term orientations and experiencing a beneficial multidimensional angle . age., prior sociosexual behavior), perceptions (i.age., philosophy about relaxed intercourse), and attention (i.age., arousal due to probability of everyday sex). not, it’s still popular that experts always studies mating actions such as for instance other posts and you can sociosexuality regarding good unidimensional means once they familiarize yourself with group correlates.
«A disorder if you are an excellent option would be one to matchmaking applications profiles try long-name established or, about, so long-identity created just like the standard populace.» It matter can be none feel addressed, nor answered on the sample, come across second section.
Response: Adopting the your own recommendation we have altered which sentence (pp. 5-six, lines 128-130): “A condition for being a good solution is that matchmaking software profiles are a lot of time-identity based or, at least, as long-identity created once the low-users”. Yet not, i have maybe not were able to select the “2nd part” that was strongly related to this dilemma. For this reason, i only altered this issue regarding your very first area of the reviewer’s opinion.
A major area is the claiming getting generalizability of the shot if you’re there are two conditions made: Once: Many years was restricted out of 18 so you’re able to twenty six.
Response: Many thanks for your own feedback. We’re not knowing on what ‘s the issue with the very last take to years. From our expertise, there have been two options. Earliest, our test can not be generalized to all society. I completely agree with that it. That’s the reason as to the reasons, currently in the previous variety of brand new manuscript, i included in the Dialogue area (now inside p. 15, traces 336-340):
Almost every other limits was basically connected with the representativeness of one’s take to and you may brand new generalization of your own results. One of the final participants, the newest take to is mostly females, aged anywhere between 18 https://datingranking.net/nl/fitness-singles-overzicht/ and you can 26, unmarried and you may from one university, putting some performance tough to generalize to all university students and you can, nevertheless reduced so you can younger low-students.
Next, if the issue is so you’re able to exclude people outside one to age groups, it choice was created to-be uniform and defined with the addition criteria out-of early in the day knowledge held with college products (look for, eg: Barrada mais aussi al., 2018; Barrada et al., 2019; Castro and you can Santos-Iglesias, 2016; Castro ainsi que al., 2020; Fernandez del Rio mais aussi al., 2019). That it appears about malfunction of one’s study’s addition conditions (now, in p. 6, traces 144-19). I made a decision to be consistent across education to minimize researchers’ level off freedom and you may, ergo, end potential p-hacking. The new difference criteria towards decades was predetermined and you can uniform in every our very own knowledge.
This may involve sociosexual choices (i
Second: Only somebody offered themselves because the men or women had been utilized in this new analyses (however they could well be decrease and you will regarded as missing throughout the regression).
Hence, including, you can easily desire a stable relationships and, whenever you are seeking they, manage multiple intimate dating as opposed to connection [twenty-seven,28]
Response: For individuals who don’t identify on their own because the boys otherwise girls, as can rise above the crowd on part Professionals (now, in p. six, traces 144-19), there were 13 individuals from a first test of 1,996, hence means 0.65% of this shot. As a result of the small size associated with decide to try of people (currently tiny before almost every other different criteria was indeed applied), it actually was ple. That have such as a limited try dimensions, statistical stamina would be low. And, this is not possible to combine this group having any of both most sex identities.
Нет Ответов