Elizabeth. (1952)
Jevons, M. P., and Parker, Meters. T. (1964). J. din. Path., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, We., and Nichols, A good. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, An effective. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you can Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1958). 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. An effective., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). In the “The fresh Medical Basis regarding Medicine Annual Remark” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College away from London area, Brand new Athlone Press, London. Parker, M. T., Todinson, A great. J. H., and you can Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The newest parasexual duration as well as use in hereditary analysis
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C Jagd Dating-Seite a d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Yards., and you may Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Report (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Statement (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and you can Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., 26, 111-122. Rountree, P. Yards., and you may Freeman, B. Meters. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, An effective. C., and you can Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and Wilson, J. B. (1958). Have always been.3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Roadway. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc
Tarr, H. A. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. Good. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and you will Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. Age. O., and Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. E. O., and Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. Age. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you may Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you will Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.
Hereditary Investigation from inside the Small-bacteria DAVID An excellent. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, England We. Addition . eleven. Segregation as the Proof Simple Hereditary Control . An excellent. This new genetic method to biology . B. The new identification away from segregation . 111. The basis out-of Hereditary Mapping . B. The fresh sequencing from loci toward an effective linkage map: multi-basis crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic fine-design . Age. Deletion mapping . IV. Useful Genetic Examination . A. Dominance tests . Bplementation evaluation . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Data inside Eukaryotic Microbes . An effective. General considerations . 1. dos. Tetrad studies . B. Genetic investigation particularly bacteria 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger or any other “imperfect” fungus step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Most other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . 10. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Study into the Prokaryotes . Good. Standard considerations . 1. Virility products and you can conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you may co-transduction . 3. Transformation and you may co-transformation cuatro. Non-selective analysis .
50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Genetic analysis in particular bacteria step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other Enteric bacterium . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor or other actinomycetes . 5. Other germs C. Certified mapping strategies separate out of recombination VII. Hereditary Study inside Viruses An effective. Standard factors . 1. Style of widespread genomes 2. Great features regarding virus genes B. Genetic investigation particularly worms step 1. Bacteriophages dos. Creature worms step 3. Bush viruses VIII. Finishing Opinions References .
Нет Ответов